Election '06: MediaLit.org

HHH Metrodome

34 Kirby Puckett Place, Minneapolis, MN 55415
Home of the Minnesota Twins

 

Metrodome on April 16, 2002, Twins vs. Royals, taken with Olympus C-2100UZ

Info Links:     Overview Video     Aerial View  (Cached)     Official Site     Ballparks.com     Sporting News

I've seen so many ballgames here that it's easy to become complacent. Yet there's no denying that this is a downright terrible place to watch baseball. But, where to begin...?

First things first, arriving at this building requires navigating a sea of surface parking lots, all charging various prices (at various times) for parking. There is no rhyme or reason, and most lots can be entered from only one direction. With all the surrounding streets being one-way, woe to the driver who misses the driveway for his desired lot. The first time you come to this stadium, plan lots of time for parking and get there early.

Real world example: Once I arrived about 20 minutes before the start of a weekday afternoon game. (This is later than I usually arrive, but it could not be avoided.) I ended up having to park about a mile from the stadium, and missed the first three innings of the game.

Special Visits

Oct 12, 1987 - Rally for AL Champ Twins
Aug 25, 1997 - National Anthem
Aug 23, 1999 - National Anthem
Nov 20, 2001 - Rally against contraction

Games 2001

Apr 11 - Tigers 1, Twins 12
Apr 29 - Orioles 0, Twins 4
May 2 - Yankees 2, Twins 4
May 23 - Mariners 5, Twins 4
May 25 - Athletics 4, Twins 2
Jun 6 - Indians 5, Twins 2
Jun 27 - White Sox 1, Twins 4
Jun 28 - White Sox 6, Twins 3
Jun 30 - Tigers 2, Twins 3
Jul 22 - Mariners 6, Twins 3
Aug 3 - Royals 7, Twins 8 (10 innings)
Aug 8 - Indians 8, Twins 2 (10 innings)
Aug 22 - Bluejays 3, Twins 6
Sep 2 - Angels 4, Twins 5
Sep 13 - Tigers at Twins (Postponed)
Sep 16 - White Sox at Twins (Postponed)
Oct 7 - White Sox 5, Twins 8

Games 2002

Apr 16 - Royals 5, Twins 8
May 2 - Devil Rays 6, Twins 7 (10 innings)
May 11 - Yankees 4, Twins 2
May 30 - Angels 6, Twins 7 (10 innings)
Jun 4 - Indians 2, Twins 23
Jun 24 - White Sox 4, Twins 5
Jul 11 - Rangers 3, Twins 4
Jul 12 - Rangers 3, Twins 4 (11 innings)

Once parked, you will enjoy a lengthy walk through blocks of city ruins. That's because the revenue from these surface lots (built where old buildings have been torn down) discourage their owners from pursuing any new development. There is no neighborhood feel whatsoever. No charm in the least. There is a gigantic hospital complex just to the south, and the rest of the buildings are industrial. (Hubert's, a bar, is the lone exception.)

Upon entering the building, your first site is of cement, lots of cement, as far as the eye can see. There is literally no way to see the playing field from the concourses. Closed circuit televisions have been added, but this is a pale substitute. It means that getting up for a snack requires ignoring the game.

Setting foot into the stadium, you get a palpable sense of disappointment. Maybe it's best to say that baseball feels like it isn't welcome here -- like it's just borrowing somebody else's stadium. The place was obviously built for football (or maybe monster truck rallies), so to accommodate baseball, they have to:

a) push back some of the seats so there's a right field;

b) hang a big plastic curtain (aka "the baggie") over those seats to keep more balls in play;

c) stretch a similar plastic substance in an arc to create an outfield "wall" which players appear to bounce off of like a trampoline; and

d) drop a huge curtain to cover the large number of seats in center field which have no chance of being sold.

There are numerous seats which do not face the infield, and those that do are behind a variety of metal barriers, psychologically distancing the fan from the action.

Real world example: I got a seat in the front row of the upper deck, directly behind home plate. When I sat down, I realized that the pipe railing in front of me directly blocked my view of the plate! I had to move up about 15 rows before I could get an unobstructed view of the action.

If you want to keep score, you'll have to pay $4 or $5 (varies by game) for a program. This is no big deal except that all I want is the scorecard, not the magazine. Other major league parks sell such things for $1 (and Comerica gives you a free pencil!). If everything else about this place was perfect, this wouldn't even be worth noting. As it is, even the small things work against the Metrodome.

The place is relentlessly blue, a color so neutral as to be nauseating. The food is boring, and there are very few roaming vendors, especially in the cheap seats. If you want something, you'll have to stop watching the game and go to the concourse (I have learned to time this with pitching changes).

If there are upsides to this venue (and I'm not really sure) they would be that:

a) It never sells out. You can always get a seat.

b) Good seats can be had for $10 if you choose your section carefully.

c) Two World Series' and an All-Star game were played here, giving the dump some real baseball history.

I'm not going to even get into the well-known issues of the bouncy playing surface, baseball-colored roof, and noise. (Bring earplugs.)

When I was a kid, the thought of a domed stadium was exciting. I even wrote to Calvin Griffith, pleading with him to get a new stadium. But my sense of disappointment was palpable the first time I set foot in the place. I hate the cement, the relentlessly blue chairs, the fly-ball camouflaging roof.

Occasionally, as I sit in my favorite section, I wonder if, after it's gone, we'll look back with fondness on this frumpy and utilitarian building. Will we miss its quirks and the advantage it gives to the Twins? Will we one day see it as a model for idiosyncratic and cheap multi-purpose stadiums?

Nah.

Other visitor comments about this page

I visited the HHH Metrodome on May 31, 2005 for the first time. I had heard so many negative things about it that I was curious to see what it would be like. I was pleasantly surprised by what I experienced. I thought the facility was neat and clean. It seemed newer than 23 years old. I walked all around the place and found the seating comfortable. The dome would have many years of life left in it, especially if the State was able to convert the outfield and turf to a permanent baseball set-up. Also, the Twins offered an excellent ticket deal: $10.00 for a seat, a hotdog, and a soft drink. Overall, I'd rate the Metrodome a "B." It's a nice place.

Ronald Theriot, LaPlace, Louisiana, 08/08/05+08:44:57

I grew up in MN & lived in St. Paul from 1981-1988. Loved going here in college. But when I returned last summer (July 2005) for the first time in 17 years...ewww! I didn't even stay past the 4th inning I was so appaaled. This place is the pits!!! Especially since I now live by Pac Bell/SBC/AT&T Park.

The good citizens of Minnesota and the fine MN Twins ballclub are looooong overdue for a new park. Hope it's built by time I next vist.

Oh & if you ever visit San Fran - don't DRIVE TO THE BALLPARK - take MUNI or BART...or you'll pay thru the NOSE to park...just like everywhere else in SF.

RIP Kirby Puckett - so sad.

Julie A., San Francisco, CA, 03/12/06+03:07:55

As a resident of Minnesota until 1999,I hated the dome for many reasons.I loved being outside and giving myself a sunburn in the bleachers of the old Met.Now,living in So.Cal and getting a chance to watch baseball in two really fine stadiums(Angel Stadium and Dodger Stadium)thats what it's all about.Dodger Stadium is the best and it was built in the 1960's.I really hope and pray that the the proposal that is before the legislature for Hennipen County to add a .03 per $20 goes thru to build a stadium worth going to.Model it after Dodger Stadium.

Bill T, Long Beach Ca., 04/16/06+13:34:30

Please use this form to add your comment to this page or to contact the author (all fields are optional, HTML not allowed)
 
Your name   
Your location   
Your comment   
Your email     (include if you wish a response, will not appear on the page)
Please select     Add your comment to this page     Send message to the author